SOAP Journal – 03 May 2018 (2 Kings 18:1-12)

He did right in the sight of the LORD, according to all that his father David had done.

2 Kings 18:3

Judah cycles from an unrighteous king in the person of Ahaz to a righteous king in the person of Hezekiah. And Hezekiah was all in. He did not just follow the LORD, but he removed the high places and broke down the sacred pillars and cut down the Asherah. He also broke in pieces the bronze serpent that Moses had made, for until those days the sons of Israel burned incense to it (v. 4). He is recorded as being a king who clung to the LORD; he did not depart from following Him, but kept His commandments, which the LORD had commanded Moses. (v. 6). Hezekiah was not perfect. He made mistakes. He did unwise things. But his devotion to the LORD resulted in being prospered by God everywhere he (Hezekiah) went (v. 7).

This first part of the life of Hezekiah is an exhortation to examine myself and see if I, too, am all in for God or if I am, like so many of the kings before Hezekiah, holding something back. Is there some high place in my life that I am unwilling to remove? Is there a sacred pillar I refuse to cut down? Obviously, these would not be literal high places or sacred pillars, but things that impede or pollute my worship of the LORD. God prescribed one place and one method of worship to the Israelites and the high places and pillars were still feeble attempts to worship God, but to do so on terms that the people could manage or understand. Maybe I do not understand why God wants Christians to do certain things or behave a certain way. Maybe God has told me personally to walk away from some activity or habit. God’s stated purpose in The Bible is to make me holy, that is to set me apart for His purposes and make me someone different than I was — someone more like Him. But I impede the process and interfere with God’s efforts when I hold back.

Hezekiah prospered on the battlefield after he got his spiritual house in order. If I want to be victorious battling against the temptations that come my way and the other spiritual foes that arise, I need to get my spiritual house in order and make sure that I worship God on His terms.

Father, thank You for this exhortation; for the challenge that Hezekiah presents me with. Please forgive me for being less than fully devoted to You. Please change my heart so that I, too, am all in for You.

Advertisements

SOAP Journal – 24 January 2018 (1 Kings 8:22-53)

Listen to the supplication of Your servant and of Your people Israel, when they pray toward this place; hear in heaven Your dwelling place; hear and forgive.

1 Kings 8:30

The core of Solomon’s prayer at the dedication of the temple is contained in this morning’s verse. Solomon’s desire is that the temple would serve as a focus point for prayer. He asks God to listen to the supplication of those who pray in and toward the temple; asks God to hear in Heaven; asks God to take action based on those prayers. In verse 39, Solomon prays that God would act and render to each according to all his ways, whose heart [God knows], for [He] alone [knows] the hearts of all the sons of men. The core request, the thing that Solomon is actively seeking is the attention of God and God’s appropriate response to the prayers of His people.

This is a common theme throughout The Bible; the attention and response of God. Abraham speaks with God often, so much so that their relationship seems almost casual, like old friends. Moses, too, spends a great deal of time speaking with God and the LORD regularly responded to the prayers of Moses. Over and over again, the theme comes to the fore that those who would walk closely with God must approach in prayer.

Last night was the first night in a six week course of study on prayer for me. My prayer life is lackluster and I often feel as though my walk with God lacks real power. And that is not God’s fault. How can He empower and direct and do the sorts of things that He wants to do if I refuse to connect with Him through prayer? He will not force the issue. But I am convinced that Solomon has the right focus as he prays for the temple. It needs to be a place where prayers are offered up and that reminds people to pray. If I am, as Corinthians says, the temple of the Holy Spirit (1 Corinthians 6:19), how much more should I be offering up prayer to God?

Father, my prayers have not been what they ought. This I confess and seek Your forgiveness. Please teach me to pray.

SOAP Journal – 09 August 2017 (Ruth 1:14)

And they lifted up their voices and wept again; and Orpah kissed her mother-in-law, but Ruth clung to her.

Ruth 1:14

I have read and heard and told the story of Ruth so many times, that it is difficult to come to this book as if for the first time. In the first part of the story, I want to zoom in on the two Moabite women: Orpah and Ruth.

Their names are kind of foreshadowing. Orpah means “gazelle” and Ruth means “friend.” One is going to bolt when trouble arrives while the other will remain. So our introduction to these women serves to tell us what is coming. And their husbands’ names fulfill much the same purpose. Mahlon and Chilion mean “sick” and “pining” respectively. When someone is sick or pining, it is only a matter of time before something has to give. Either they will recover or the illness persist or will worsen. Either they will get the thing for which they pine, or desire will make them sick.

And being widowed is the trouble that the names foreshadowed. Both husbands die, leaving behind both wives with their widowed mother-in-law. Three widows in three verses (vv. 3-5). At the beginning, both women do what is socially expected of them at the time. Naomi decides to go back to Judah and her daughters start packing to go with her (v. 7).  This was the social norm of the time. Once a woman married into a family, she was considered a part of that family. Where the family went, she went. And Naomi is all that remains of the family.

Naomi tells the young women that they should go back to their families (vv. 8-9). She tells them that she, being a widow herself, has no hope of producing any more children (or really of being remarried) and that there is no way for her to provide new husbands for these women. Again, the social norm of the time was that a woman was provided for by her husband. It was a fairly common practice that a surviving brother would marry his deceased brother’s widow in order to provide for her and continue the family name. If a woman did not marry, then she was supported by her father.

Both of the young women do what would have been expected at the time. They protest and say that they will stay with Naomi. Again, family was a big deal back then and staying with family was considered right and proper.

That brings us up to this morning’s verse. Orpah makes a ruckus then kisses Naomi goodbye and goes back to her old life. She might have remarried and had a troupe of children. The Bible is silent on the matter. Ruth, on the other hand, refuses to leave Naomi. When Ruth promised herself to her husband, she was all in. She had decided that she was going to stay with this family come what may. And she does. Her husband has died and her mother-in-law tried to send her back to her parents. But Ruth refused to be sent back. She utters what may be one of the more famous quotes in the book that bears her name, Do not urge me to leave you [or] turn back from following you; for where you go, I will go, and where you lodge, I will lodge. Your people [shall be] my people, and your God, my God. Where you die, I will die, and there I will be buried. Thus may the LORD do to me, and worse, if [anything but] death parts you and me (Ruth 1:16-17). Ruth lives up to her name and is a friend to Naomi.

The story turns out very well indeed for Ruth, though it is not all sunshine and roses along the way. But I want to come back to the two Moabite women.

Orpah married a man. She did not marry his family or his faith or anything else that came along with the package. She just married the man. So, when the mane was gone, so was she. I am not going to advocate for women taking on their husband’s faith or abandoning their family or anything like that. I am, rather, going to take Orpah as a metaphor.

Ruth, contrarily, married not just the man but his family and people and faith. She committed herself to the whole package. Again, I am not going to take Ruth as a case in point and try to make any assertions about marriage, but will take Ruth as a metaphor.

Orpah and Ruth both married Israelites; committed themselves to the family of faith. When trial came, they had very different responses. Orpah could be, as Jesus put it in the parable of the sower, the rocky soil. The seed sprouted quickly, but had no root and so it withered when trouble came. Ruth could be, per the same parable, the good soil. The seed sprouted and had good roots, so it weathered the difficulty. Orpah might be seen as a type of fair weather believer: glad to be in the family of faith when things are good and prospects are promising, but ready to leave when things get tough. Ruth might be seen as believer dedicated to following come what may: nothing shakes her resolve to remain with the family of faith.

With which woman do I empathize? Do I find it difficult to stay with the family of faith; to remain dedicated to God and His people when things get rough and the way forward is difficult to discern? Or am I committed to God and His people no matter what?

Father, I know that things get difficult sometimes and that I struggle to hold on. Please give me a devotion like Ruth’s, that holds on no matter what and commits me to You and Your people unreservedly.