SOAP Journal – 03 May 2018 (2 Kings 18:1-12)

He did right in the sight of the LORD, according to all that his father David had done.

2 Kings 18:3

Judah cycles from an unrighteous king in the person of Ahaz to a righteous king in the person of Hezekiah. And Hezekiah was all in. He did not just follow the LORD, but he removed the high places and broke down the sacred pillars and cut down the Asherah. He also broke in pieces the bronze serpent that Moses had made, for until those days the sons of Israel burned incense to it (v. 4). He is recorded as being a king who clung to the LORD; he did not depart from following Him, but kept His commandments, which the LORD had commanded Moses. (v. 6). Hezekiah was not perfect. He made mistakes. He did unwise things. But his devotion to the LORD resulted in being prospered by God everywhere he (Hezekiah) went (v. 7).

This first part of the life of Hezekiah is an exhortation to examine myself and see if I, too, am all in for God or if I am, like so many of the kings before Hezekiah, holding something back. Is there some high place in my life that I am unwilling to remove? Is there a sacred pillar I refuse to cut down? Obviously, these would not be literal high places or sacred pillars, but things that impede or pollute my worship of the LORD. God prescribed one place and one method of worship to the Israelites and the high places and pillars were still feeble attempts to worship God, but to do so on terms that the people could manage or understand. Maybe I do not understand why God wants Christians to do certain things or behave a certain way. Maybe God has told me personally to walk away from some activity or habit. God’s stated purpose in The Bible is to make me holy, that is to set me apart for His purposes and make me someone different than I was — someone more like Him. But I impede the process and interfere with God’s efforts when I hold back.

Hezekiah prospered on the battlefield after he got his spiritual house in order. If I want to be victorious battling against the temptations that come my way and the other spiritual foes that arise, I need to get my spiritual house in order and make sure that I worship God on His terms.

Father, thank You for this exhortation; for the challenge that Hezekiah presents me with. Please forgive me for being less than fully devoted to You. Please change my heart so that I, too, am all in for You.


SOAP Journal – 28 November 2017 (2 Samuel 15)

The king went out and all the people with him, and they stopped at the last house.

2 Samuel 15:17

After being in Jerusalem for a time and seducing the hearts of the Israelites away from David, Absalom makes his move and goes to Hebron to begin his open rebellion. David gets wind of it and packs up everyone still loyal to him and leaves the city. There are several notes about who went and who stayed behind — and the list keeps growing for the next couple chapters.

Among those who go is one Ittai the Gittite. This man was an exiled foreigner who had recently settled in the land and that is about all that The Bible reveals about him. He swears his allegiance to David and later acquits himself well in the battle against Absalom. What I see in this man is a loyalty to the one who welcomed him and gave him a new home. In a spiritual sense, every believer was lost and adrift before coming to Christ. We were exiles from Heaven that Christ welcomed in. Our devotion to our King should be like Ittai’s.

Zadok and Abiathar, priests both, sought to bring the Ark with them and go with David. David prevents them from coming, telling them that God will bring him (David) back or not as seems best to Him (God). These men wanted to bring God’s presence into the situation. Believers are called by Peter a royal priesthood and the statement is sung in the praises of the elders  around God’s throne in John’s vision in Revelation. As a royal priest, I should be bringing God’s presence with me wherever I go. And I do, whether I am conscious of it or no. When God takes up residence in me, it means that He goes with me where I go. But Zadok and Abiathar remind me that I ought to be bringing God into difficult situations openly and obviously.

The last man mentioned in this chapter is Hushai the Archite. This man wants to come with David. The only thing that The Bible tells me about Hushai is that he was David’s friend. And he demonstrates what a friend should do. He offers to go into the difficulty with his friend. David prevents him, setting him up instead as a mole. And Hushai goes along with it, accepting that his friend has more need of him passing information out of the court than with that friend in the trial.  I, too, ought to be such a friend to my King — willing to go where my King wants me and be what best serves His plans.

My God, thank You for the example of these men. Please make my devotion like Ittai’s, my readiness to openly and obviously bring You into difficult situations like Zadok and Abiathar, and my friendship to You like Hushai’s to David.

SOAP Journal – 09 August 2017 (Ruth 1:14)

And they lifted up their voices and wept again; and Orpah kissed her mother-in-law, but Ruth clung to her.

Ruth 1:14

I have read and heard and told the story of Ruth so many times, that it is difficult to come to this book as if for the first time. In the first part of the story, I want to zoom in on the two Moabite women: Orpah and Ruth.

Their names are kind of foreshadowing. Orpah means “gazelle” and Ruth means “friend.” One is going to bolt when trouble arrives while the other will remain. So our introduction to these women serves to tell us what is coming. And their husbands’ names fulfill much the same purpose. Mahlon and Chilion mean “sick” and “pining” respectively. When someone is sick or pining, it is only a matter of time before something has to give. Either they will recover or the illness persist or will worsen. Either they will get the thing for which they pine, or desire will make them sick.

And being widowed is the trouble that the names foreshadowed. Both husbands die, leaving behind both wives with their widowed mother-in-law. Three widows in three verses (vv. 3-5). At the beginning, both women do what is socially expected of them at the time. Naomi decides to go back to Judah and her daughters start packing to go with her (v. 7).  This was the social norm of the time. Once a woman married into a family, she was considered a part of that family. Where the family went, she went. And Naomi is all that remains of the family.

Naomi tells the young women that they should go back to their families (vv. 8-9). She tells them that she, being a widow herself, has no hope of producing any more children (or really of being remarried) and that there is no way for her to provide new husbands for these women. Again, the social norm of the time was that a woman was provided for by her husband. It was a fairly common practice that a surviving brother would marry his deceased brother’s widow in order to provide for her and continue the family name. If a woman did not marry, then she was supported by her father.

Both of the young women do what would have been expected at the time. They protest and say that they will stay with Naomi. Again, family was a big deal back then and staying with family was considered right and proper.

That brings us up to this morning’s verse. Orpah makes a ruckus then kisses Naomi goodbye and goes back to her old life. She might have remarried and had a troupe of children. The Bible is silent on the matter. Ruth, on the other hand, refuses to leave Naomi. When Ruth promised herself to her husband, she was all in. She had decided that she was going to stay with this family come what may. And she does. Her husband has died and her mother-in-law tried to send her back to her parents. But Ruth refused to be sent back. She utters what may be one of the more famous quotes in the book that bears her name, Do not urge me to leave you [or] turn back from following you; for where you go, I will go, and where you lodge, I will lodge. Your people [shall be] my people, and your God, my God. Where you die, I will die, and there I will be buried. Thus may the LORD do to me, and worse, if [anything but] death parts you and me (Ruth 1:16-17). Ruth lives up to her name and is a friend to Naomi.

The story turns out very well indeed for Ruth, though it is not all sunshine and roses along the way. But I want to come back to the two Moabite women.

Orpah married a man. She did not marry his family or his faith or anything else that came along with the package. She just married the man. So, when the mane was gone, so was she. I am not going to advocate for women taking on their husband’s faith or abandoning their family or anything like that. I am, rather, going to take Orpah as a metaphor.

Ruth, contrarily, married not just the man but his family and people and faith. She committed herself to the whole package. Again, I am not going to take Ruth as a case in point and try to make any assertions about marriage, but will take Ruth as a metaphor.

Orpah and Ruth both married Israelites; committed themselves to the family of faith. When trial came, they had very different responses. Orpah could be, as Jesus put it in the parable of the sower, the rocky soil. The seed sprouted quickly, but had no root and so it withered when trouble came. Ruth could be, per the same parable, the good soil. The seed sprouted and had good roots, so it weathered the difficulty. Orpah might be seen as a type of fair weather believer: glad to be in the family of faith when things are good and prospects are promising, but ready to leave when things get tough. Ruth might be seen as believer dedicated to following come what may: nothing shakes her resolve to remain with the family of faith.

With which woman do I empathize? Do I find it difficult to stay with the family of faith; to remain dedicated to God and His people when things get rough and the way forward is difficult to discern? Or am I committed to God and His people no matter what?

Father, I know that things get difficult sometimes and that I struggle to hold on. Please give me a devotion like Ruth’s, that holds on no matter what and commits me to You and Your people unreservedly.

Promise (1 Chronicles 17:13-14)

“I will be His Father, and He shall be my Son; and I will not take My lovingkindness away from Him, as I took it from him who was before you. But I will settle Him in My house and in My kingdom forever, and His throne shall be established forever.”

1 Chronicles 17:13-14

So, David felt bad that he was living in a “permanent” house while the Ark — the symbol of God’s presence — was sitting in a tent. He decides that he wants to build a permanent dwelling for the Ark and the prophet Nathan thinks it’s a great idea. This morning’s verses are the tail end of what God tells Nathan to say to David. The summary is that God is pleased that David is so concerned about God and about God’s glory and about the obvious disparity between Israel’s king and Israel’s God at that moment. God tells David that he (David) will not build a house for God, but that God will “build a house” for David. This promise includes the promise that the Messiah would be of the line of David — this morning’s verses.

God promises that the King He establishes will be God’s Son. Jesus is the Son of God and is of the line of David. God promises not to take away His lovingkindness — sometimes rendered “mercy” — away from this King. The promise continues that God will establish this King in His (God’s) house and kingdom forever. Ultimately, God promises that one of David’s descendants will be the Messiah. No other figure in Israel’s history receives that particular package deal of promises.

Fast forward to the NT. One writes, “Behold what manner of love the Father has given to us that we may become to children of God.” God, through Christ, extends the promise of sonship to everyone who believers. Another writes that those who believe are not destined for wrath, implying that God’s mercy rests on us. Jesus says that He has gone to prepare a place for us in His Father’s house where there are many mansions. The promises made to David are fulfilled in Christ and Christ then extends many (not all) of those promises to those who believe. Why? As Paul wrote, if anyone is in Christ, he is a new creation. Old things have passed away. Behold, all things are new. The emphasis added reminds me of why those promises are extended to me as a believer. They are extended because I am in Christ. Christ is the intended recipient.

Application? God has made promises both lovely and frightening. Am I living as the recipient of those promises? A quick jaunt through scripture reveals that I am promised grace sufficient to withstand the trials and temptations in my life and many, many other things. Am I receiving those promises and living accordingly? If not, I am probably a pretty sad excuse for what I could be in Christ. If not, why not?

Missed Opportunities

Then the LORD said to Jacob, “Return to the land of your fathers and to your relatives, and I will be with you.”

Genesis 31:3

Ever notice how sometimes God gives only enough direction to provide a general sense of which way He wants us to go? Jacob has noticed that Laban’s attitude toward him has changed and that Laban’s sons, Jacob’s brothers-in-law, are grumbling about God’s blessing on Jacob. Things are going south in a big way. In the midst of all this, God drops in and says, “Hit the road, Jake.”

I think this was an opportunity for Jacob. God didn’t say how or when to leave; He just said leave. Jacob was given the opportunity to be up front about things. He could have gone to Laban and said, “I’ve noticed that relations are strained and thought it might be a good time for me to head back home. I mean, my folks haven’t met the grand kids yet and your sons seem to be really unhappy with the way things are. So, I think I’ll be heading out tomorrow.” Jacob could have given Laban the chance to do something sneaky and have God pop in and tell Laban not to mess with Jacob like that. So many things could have been and might have been, but they weren’t. And I think that means Jacob missed this opportunity.

Sometimes, God does the same thing with me. He tells me that He wants to do something, but only gives enough information for me to take an opportunity or miss it. Years ago, I was approached and asked to pray about serving in the junior high youth ministry at the church I was attending at the time. I thought I was being asked to pick up teaching duties and prayed generally about whether or not God wanted me to step into that service. I got a “Yes” back and passed the answer along to the pastor who had talked with me. He prayed over me and the prayer was for a ministry overseer. What? I proceeded to serve and stumble and bumble my way through a year or two of overseeing that ministry and eventually stepped down when I probably should have stayed. God gave only as much information as I needed to make the decision. I asked if He wanted me in that role and He said yes. I didn’t ask Him what the role was or He might have answered. Had Jacob asked God when He wanted Jacob to leave, I suspect that God would have given a very specific answer.

There it is. I think that this morning’s verse is about opportunities. I think God will sometimes give just enough information tknow what His will is without giving us the how He wants it done. Maybe He gives us these general instructions to bring us back to Him. I mean, Jacob hadn’t really been talking with God very much that The Bible records — and we’re talking about a period of twenty years. Maybe Gd gives us these generalized instructions to take the pulse of our understanding. Will we do things His way or our way; will we rely on Him or fall back on habits that have managed to eke us through? God’s not interested in us eking through, He came that we might have life and that more abundantly. So He wants us to do things His way so we can enjoy the blessings thereof. I could spend all morning theorizing about why God might do this and any of the theories could be right in a given situation and they could all be wrong because God’s thoughts are so much higher than mine.

God is going to give general direction and opportunities. How will I respond?


Father God, do not let me do things as Jacob did: in my own strength and reasoning and abilities. Please cause me, instead, to turn to You for further guidance and for strength to do Your work in Your way. Thank You that You care enough to direct at all and that You are just as interested in how and why I do things as You are in what I do.


But Laban said to him, “If now it pleases you, stay with me; I have divined that the LORD has blessed me on your account”

Genesis 30:27

Sometimes, people are blessed because they are righteous. We see examples of this peppered around The Bible.

Sometimes, people are blessed for no reason in particular. I mean, there is a verse that says God rains down His blessings on the righteous and unrighteous alike. It’s like God’s just looking to bless someone and that individual gets singled out. No issues of merit or deserving involved.

Sometimes, people are blessed because of righteous people hanging with them. This was the case for Laban. Now, Laban pulled the old switcheroo on Jacob, which amuses me since Jacob had a habit of pulling that same maneuver on other people, while Jacob had been faithful in his service to Laban. Laban’s flocks had gone from sad to spectacular under Jacob’s care. I can think of a lot of really plausible theories as to why, but the theories don’t really matter. The end result is that Laban’s oversight spelled sad flock while Jacob’s oversight resulted in numerous, healthy livestock. Why? According to Laban: Jacob. And The Bible does not add any note that Laban was wrong.

I think that the same can be true of God’s children today. When we are walking with God as we should and doing all things as unto the LORD then we will be a very standard blessing to our employers: a good employee. We live in times when people insist on their “rights” and make a fuss when things are not strictly according to Hoyle. I’m not saying that rules shouldn’t be followed or that workers should be exploited, but in an economy with college graduates unemployed we might want to show a bit more gratitude for having a job if we have one.

In a few minutes, I am going to leave this keyboard and get ready for work. What kind of an employee will I be? Will I be the sort who blesses my company with diligence and dedication to seeing my work done right—in short a blessing—or will I slack off and generally waste the company’s resources by being an unproductive drain on them? The choice is mine.

But there is an element over which I have no control. God may choose to bless the work I do beyond my meager ability. I may be doing nothing more than the best I can at my work and God takes that “best” and makes more of it than I could ever manage. When He does something like that, I become a blessing to my employer like Jacob was to Laban.

Does the story of Jacob and Laban end here? Not even close. But this is where I’m stopping my train of thought this morning, with the choice: Do I choose to be diligent and do the very best I am able or do I choose to be a drain on my company? The choice is mine.

A Gentle Spirit

And Leah’s eyes were weak, but Rachel was beautiful of form and face.

Genesis 27:17

Much has been made of this verse in many ways. More, lots of folks skip over this one and land on the “romantic” verse where Jacob works for seven years and they seem like a day because of his love for Rachel. While I recognize the romance of the other verse (I’ve heard women give a swooning sigh over it more than once), I wanted to explore something that caught in my brain this morning.

The notion of Leah having “weak eyes” has been interpreted in lots of ways — mostly giving the impression that she was not an attractive woman. The words used and how Strong’s concordance gives their possible definitions left me with a different impression. The word “eyes” is the word `ayin (עַיִן) and could mean her literal eyes, but could also mean mental qualities or spiritual qualities (or fountain, which I do not want to get into at this hour of the day). So it could be that her physical eyes are missing a certain something that a guy would have found attractive and desirable back then, but it could also mean that her mental or spiritual qualities are what is referenced. The word “weak” is rak (רַךְ) and means tender, soft, delicate, or weak. With all of this in mind, two alternate notions of what Jacob found lacking in Leah present themselves.

First, Leah could have been feeble-minded. There are folks who are not the most mentally astute; not the sharpest knives in the drawer. This does not say anything about their physical attractiveness or anything else, just that they’re not PhD candidates. And there is not thing one wrong with that. This notion makes Jacob’s later confusion of Leah for Rachel a bit more understandable to me, since a weak mind would probably not be something on parade during the wedding night.

Second, this could refer to Leah being of a tender spirit. My wife is a bit like this. Her heart and soul are sensitive and tender and require a bit more care in terms of how I approach her. For the sake of clarity, I should mention that tact and I are not exactly on one another’s speed dial, so this is challenging for me. Would this manifest on the wedding night and give Jacob a hint that he had the wrong woman in his tent? Probably not. A tender spirit manifests in very loving ways. My wife is sensitive to my needs and desires and tries very hard to make sure she communicates her love in ways that I understand. I’m male and especially oblivious for my gender (ladies, you can commiserate with my wife later), so this is not always easy for her.

What would either of these imply about Rachel? See, the focus is so often on Leah and how sad it is for her that we forget to flip it around and see what the statement about Leah implies about her little sister. If the idea is that Leah was not mentally acute then the implication is that Rachel was. Or, at the very least, was moreso than her sister. If the idea is that Leah had a tender spirit then the implication is that Rachel was a ferocious spirit. Or, again, at least less tender than Leah. Among her sisters (my wife has two), my wife is the gentle and tender spirit. She can be ferocious when necessary, but she’s generally not. Something else about tender spirits: they’re not forward. To a guy like Jacob—or, you know, most guys—a forward woman is attractive in a very particular way. Rachel might have been the kind of woman who just came out and told anyone and everyone what she wanted (reference her later demand that Jacob give her children or she would die) whereas Leah might have been more the type who just let what she wanted fall by the wayside.

So…? The second idea is the one that really impacts me this morning. My wife is a gentle spirit and there is much to be said in favor of that type of woman. First, gentle spirits tend to encourage quietly and not stumble. Later on, Rachel will be the one stealing her father’s household idols and getting in arguments with Jacob. Leah will be a wife and mother and—more importantly—not mentioned as having anything to do with idols. Second, gentle spirits want to be loved. As the nation starts, Leah keeps hoping that this son will mean that Jacob is attached to her and loves her; that this will be the time she finally feels loved. The implication for spouses of these gentle spirits is that we need (I include my married-to-a-gentle-spirit self in the group) need to make sure our spouses know that they are loved. It encourages their heart and bolsters their spirit. Third, gentle spirits have a spiritual legacy. Ready for this? Rachel’s sons produce a type of Christ (Joseph) and the first king of Israel (Saul, tribe of Benjamin). Leah’s sons include Levi—the tribe that births Moses and the priesthood— and Judah—the tribe that leads to a Man from Nazareth named Jesus. Leah, in all her gentleness, is given a spiritual legacy that continues to bless us today.